Ah, no! The weak empirical evidence here is that "homosexual individuals have fewer children than heterosexual individuals," i.e. that there is a substantial (or any) biological fitness cost to being queer.
I am incredibly skeptical of the idea that there's much cost one way or another, especially since human social bonds and rearing success are so very reliant on a lot of things beyond whether or not you had sex by inserting tab A into slot B, and because so little of human reproductive effort is expended in actually getting dicks wet.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2018-12-22 05:16 pm (UTC)I am incredibly skeptical of the idea that there's much cost one way or another, especially since human social bonds and rearing success are so very reliant on a lot of things beyond whether or not you had sex by inserting tab A into slot B, and because so little of human reproductive effort is expended in actually getting dicks wet.