<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>

<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>sciatrix</title>
  <link>https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/</link>
  <description>sciatrix - Dreamwidth Studios</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:18:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / Dreamwidth Studios</generator>
  <lj:journal>sciatrix</lj:journal>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/27381.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2011 00:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
  <link>https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/27381.html</link>
  <description>So &lt;a href=&quot;http://fuckyeahmelancholy.tumblr.com/post/8869839986/scott-lobdell-revealed-another-big-difference-to&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; popped up on Tumblr today. And I read it and got very excited--not even entirely because the idea of Tim Drake being asexual is awesome, but because it had a creator discussing an asexual character and acknowledging that asexuality is a sexual orientation that real people have, and oh my gosh I &lt;em&gt;never&lt;/em&gt; get to see that. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And then I noticed that the source was broken. And that when I Googled around I could find &lt;em&gt;no&lt;/em&gt; other mention of it. And then I stopped to consider what the actual likelihood of DC Comics doing something like this was and... yeah. Unlikely. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just. I don&apos;t even. &lt;em&gt;Why would you lie about this?!&lt;/em&gt; What possible reason would someone have to create this hoax? Why would you do this? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&apos;m angry and upset and frustrated, because it feels like someone dangled a delicious sandwich in my face while I&apos;m starving and then snatched it away. And now, on top of everything, I&apos;m feeling especially sensitized to the way creators frame asexual characters in media. Because you know that creators never bother to mention that asexuality&apos;s a sexual orientation, or that actual asexual people might want to see themselves now and again. That &lt;em&gt;alone&lt;/em&gt; ought to have tipped me off, and I am so angry and sad that I feel that way.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sciatrix&amp;ditemid=27381&quot; width=&quot;30&quot; height=&quot;12&quot; alt=&quot;comment count unavailable&quot; style=&quot;vertical-align: middle;&quot;/&gt; comments</description>
  <comments>https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/27381.html</comments>
  <category>asexuality</category>
  <category>media</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>7</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
