<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2011-02-08:695695</id>
  <title>sciatrix</title>
  <subtitle>sciatrix</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>sciatrix</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2019-01-21T16:42:32Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="sciatrix" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2011-02-08:695695:54677</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/54677.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://sciatrix.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=54677"/>
    <title>Anyone with a lot of experience in social psychology lit?</title>
    <published>2019-01-21T16:42:32Z</published>
    <updated>2019-01-21T16:42:32Z</updated>
    <category term="psychology"/>
    <category term="social psychology"/>
    <category term="science!"/>
    <category term="research"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>4</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">This book I'm reading is giving me a lot of interesting thoughts, but I've also seen a lot of yelling about the replicability of social psychology results (like the marshmallow experiment) in the years since I've finished my bachelor's. Since I've more or less ignored the human psych literature except as it relates to my field, I'm a little bit at a loss when it comes to evaluating that research as a whole. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How much of the irreproducibility discussion undermines this body of work? How much smoke is there in that fire? Anyone know?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=sciatrix&amp;ditemid=54677" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
